I think I have more than an idea of what her answer would be~. And I'll atone for that later when I can do so properly, you have my word. Or should I say my tongue?
It wasn't disappointing, if that's what you're asking. Kanon herself only has use to those who are willing to use her, of which the number among you is quite low. So in that sense, their choice, regardless of who the other party was, was an agreeable one.
Hahaha, your way of manipulating me into finding a way to see you again?
[She does miss Sonya, doesn't she? There has been so much going on - but she has never once felt confused about what she believed was the understanding between them.]
If we had found the other party, I reckon the outcome would have been the same. Unless someone killed her on the spot and we dragged the second to the gallows... Well, I'm sad to have missed the chance.
Along with other things, I'm sure. Worry not, it's mutual.
[ He can be a bit more...this now that he's free to be looser with his image. ]
In that case, I wouldn't call myself neutral in the slightest. Neutrality is reserved for those with the privilege to be so, one cannot be neutral when it comes to their life, or livelihood. I align myself with those I share a common vision with and those who are willing to help me achieve my ideal.
We don't need to fully align to be comrades, rather, we simply need to both be able to help each other. We're stronger together, no matter who we are.
[Sonya really does remind her of him ... Is this what it would have been like, if he didn't have to hide?]
United under a common goal, then? Haha... In circumstances like these, it's too dangerous to be alone or think anything can be done so. Isn't that the reason livestock live in herds to begin with?
At least you aren't going around pretending we're all meant to be friends.
What's going to happen, though, Sonya, when they can't abide by someone else's methods?
no subject
It wasn't disappointing, if that's what you're asking. Kanon herself only has use to those who are willing to use her, of which the number among you is quite low. So in that sense, their choice, regardless of who the other party was, was an agreeable one.
no subject
[She does miss Sonya, doesn't she? There has been so much going on - but she has never once felt confused about what she believed was the understanding between them.]
If we had found the other party, I reckon the outcome would have been the same. Unless someone killed her on the spot and we dragged the second to the gallows... Well, I'm sad to have missed the chance.
Are your conditions so neutral as reported?
no subject
[ Just leave him in the graveyard for all eternity. ]
My personal ones, or the deceased in general?
no subject
I've decided you're going to tell me about both, so why not start with yourself?
no subject
[ He can be a bit more...this now that he's free to be looser with his image. ]
In that case, I wouldn't call myself neutral in the slightest. Neutrality is reserved for those with the privilege to be so, one cannot be neutral when it comes to their life, or livelihood. I align myself with those I share a common vision with and those who are willing to help me achieve my ideal.
We don't need to fully align to be comrades, rather, we simply need to both be able to help each other. We're stronger together, no matter who we are.
no subject
United under a common goal, then? Haha... In circumstances like these, it's too dangerous to be alone or think anything can be done so. Isn't that the reason livestock live in herds to begin with?
At least you aren't going around pretending we're all meant to be friends.
What's going to happen, though, Sonya, when they can't abide by someone else's methods?
no subject
And of course not. I'm an optimist, but I'm not a fool. Those two seem to get conflated more often than not, but that's advantageous in its own way.
Put simply: if they can't abide, then they'll die out, most likely. You need to adapt to survive, it's the very nature of human existence, is it not?